The Crisis in Renewable Technology Accreditation and Its Impact on Quality Standards
- James

- Sep 5
- 3 min read
The renewable technology sector is facing a pivotal moment. Gone are the days when a simple qualification and a few hundred pounds could secure accreditation. As this industry matures, the demand for strict standards and verified expertise is more critical than ever. But do current procedures genuinely ensure these standards?
With initiatives like PA2030 focused on maintaining high insulation standards, we are seeing alarming trends. Companies are losing their Trustmarks, and consumers are increasingly complaining about poor workmanship. The Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS) aims to uphold high standards in renewable technologies, yet reports of sub-par installations in 2025 are concerning.
The stark reality is that accreditation is often available to those who can pay for it. However, small, passionate local companies that prioritize quality are being sidelined. This development poses serious concerns for the future growth of renewable technologies.
The Flaws in Current Accreditation Processes
Today's accreditation processes have significant flaws that create hurdles for talented engineers and small businesses. One major reason we are not installing enough heat pumps is due to artificially high product prices set by manufacturers. For example, many heat pumps can cost upwards of £10,000, limiting homeowners’ ability to invest in greener energy solutions.
The accreditation process itself impedes many skilled engineers and local businesses from entering the market. This results in a cycle where only those with substantial financial backing can compete, while passionate, quality-focused installers are pushed out.
The Impact of Rising Accreditation Costs
Consider the recent increase in MCS prices by the IAA. As of September 1, 2025, the cost for two technologies and Trustmark skyrocketed from around £1,700 to approximately £2,500—a staggering £800 hike.
How can this steep increase be justified? In comparison, organizations like Napit offer similar packages for about £1,000. This disparity raises serious concerns about the value provided by institutions. The escalation not only burdens companies seeking accreditation but also influences the overall quality of installations and customer satisfaction. Studies suggest a direct correlation between the cost of accreditation and the quality of service provided, with lower costs leading to a wider range of skilled providers.
The Consequences of Inaction
Without prompt action from industry leaders, government agencies, and relevant organizations, the nation may fall behind in achieving renewable energy targets. The lack of accessible accreditation processes could stifle innovation and restrict the entry of skilled professionals into the field.
The rising costs of accreditation will ultimately deter small businesses from participating. This could lead to a market dominated by just a handful of large corporations. Consumers will suffer as they miss out on diverse options and lower prices from local providers dedicated to quality.
The Need for Reform
For the renewable technology sector to thrive, a comprehensive reform of the accreditation process is a must. This reform should aim to make accreditation more accessible and affordable for small businesses while ensuring that quality and competency standards are preserved.
Moreover, there should be a focused effort to reduce product prices for technologies such as heat pumps, encouraging broader adoption and supporting the nation’s renewable energy goals.
The Urgency for Change
The crisis in renewable technology accreditation is a significant issue that demands immediate attention. As the industry wrestles with rising costs and flawed processes, the future of quality standards remains uncertain.
It is crucial for all stakeholders to unite and tackle these challenges head-on. By supporting small businesses and simplifying the accreditation landscape, we can create an environment that fosters quality and innovation.
The time for meaningful change is now. If we hesitate to act, we risk losing the essential attributes that underpin the renewable technology sector, which is vital for our future sustainability.




Comments